A
Academic offences, plagiarism and originality checking: academic offences occur in different forms, cheating in exams, using essay mills, ghost writing and intentional or unintentional plagiarism. The University of Plymouth defines plagiarism as "the representation of another person's work (including another student's) as your own, without acknowledging the source". The University of Plymouth has developed
guidance on how to prevent academic offences.
Academic partnerships: academic partnerships works with partners to effectively align practice to the rapidly changing national and international Higher Education landscape.
Accreditation of Prior Certificated Learning (APCL): regulations relating to
APCL.
Academic Support Technology and Innovation (ASTI): Academic Support, Technology & Innovation (ASTI) supports staff in the use of digital technologies and resources, for teaching; learning; assessment; research; and university administration.
Access and Participation Plans: access and participation plans (formerly known as Access Agreements) set out how higher education providers will improve equality of opportunity in HE. They must be approved by the Office for Students (OfS) if the provider wants to charge higher tuition fees. OfS monitor plans to ensure providers meet their commitments, and take action if they do not.
View the latest University of Plymouth plan.
Allergies: you should seek advice from the student as well as information from their GP/consultant. Using this advice, and dependent on the degree programme studied, you should then undertake a risk assessment to remove/ reduce risk. The
Student Support Document (SSD) should be involved for severe allergies that may affect study. With the student’s consent, local first aiders should be made aware of severe allergies/ reactions.
Annual review: an annual health check on the quality, standards and relevance of all the University’s taught programmes of study (undergraduate and postgraduate) and on the student experience. Find more information in the
Faculty Quality Assurance Procedures.
Appeal against an assessment decision: after an assessment board has met to make the final assessment decision, a student is then able to appeal. The appeal procedure relates to the Assessment Board processes. For more information visit
academic appeals, where you can find links to the latest appeal guidance and policy. Your Faculty office and the
UPSU Advice Centre can also offer advice to you and students.
Approval document: this is a document, required at programme approval, which sets the context for the programme’s development. It explains and justifies the programme on academic grounds. Find out more in the
Quality Assurance Handbook.
Aspire: Aspire
is an electronic reading list system. It can provide easy access to all resources for students, embedding resources directly into the lists. Aspire is easy to add and edit. It allows staff to build your own library of high quality resources. Reading lists can be linked from module sites on the DLE. Training is available through Employee Self Service. For further information email
informationspecialists@plymouth.ac.uk
Assessment, alternative: enables students to meet the learning objective and assessment criteria using different assessment approaches. In some circumstances you can offer a student another assessment method (e.g. an assignment instead of a seen exam) that is agreed with Disability Services and the external examiner. Find out more on the
assessment pages and in the
Assessment Policy.
Assessment – anonymous:
- Anonymous assessment should ensure summative assessments are marked as far as possible and where appropriate without the student’s name or identity being made known to the marker or subject assessment panel.
- Anonymity provides reassurance for students and assessors against the perception of discrimination and bias entering the assessment process, and aims to ensure all students are treated equally.
- Anonymous assessment should not impede rapid feed forward and feedback to students.
PU Anonymous Assessment policy.
Assessment – authentic: relevant and meaningful assessment tasks that replicate the real world in their specific field (for example simulations, role play, scenarios, problem tasks, real-world case studies).
Further information and guidance.
Assessment Board: the responsibilities of the
Board are to:
- make decisions on progression and awards for all students registered for the named award(s) for which the board is responsible
- ensure that decisions are arrived at fairly and democratically, in accordance with the regulatory framework for undergraduate awards and integrated masters, and that justice is done to the individual student
- make sure that threshold academic standards of student performance are being maintained at award level, on the basis of the reports received from each of the constituent subject assessment panel chairs on the standard of assessment in subjects/modules, and are comparable with similar awards in other UK institutions, in the expert opinion of the award external examiner
- ensure that in making decisions all corroborated extenuating circumstances relating to individual students have been fully taken into account before a decision is reached
- report and discuss, where appropriate, any examination or assessment offences and take appropriate action.
Assessment, Computer Aided (CAA): including any instance in which some aspect of computer technology is deployed as part of the assessment process, CAA is efficient for both formative and summative assessment. Ensure students with a MAP (Modified Assessment Provision) participating in a CAA receive their entitlements including extra time. For further information visit ASTI web pages on
Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) Tools.
Assessment criteria: a description of what the learner has to do in order to demonstrate that the learning outcomes have been achieved.
Assessment, formative: an assessment task with a developmental purpose. It is designed to help students learn more effectively by giving them feedback on their performance and on how it can be improved, maintained, or both.
Assessment, group work: students need clear guidance on the expectations of
group work. The design of a group work assessment should take into consideration the size of the groups and ensure the task is complex enough to require a collaborative approach. You should specify how the groups' progress will be monitored and whether the assessment is of the product or process, the group and/or individual contribution. Further guidance on assessing group work is available on the
Teaching and Learning Support - Assessment web pages and in the
7 Steps to Group Assessment resource.
Assessment, inclusive: we want all students to have an equitable, supported assessment experience. Inclusive assessments will:
- fairly evaluate students’ ability to meet module and programme learning outcomes and academic standards
- be accessible for all students
- provide every student with an equal opportunity to demonstrate their achievement
- support student engagement, learning, progression, retention and address the needs of our diverse student population
- be authentic and offer students contextualised meaningful tasks that replicate real world challenges through effective programme design
- reduce the need for MAPs (Modified Assessment Provisions).
Find more information on inclusive assessment:
Assessment, ipsative: assessment against the student’s own previous standards. It can measure how well a particular task has been undertaken against the student’s average attainment, against their best work, or against their most recent piece of work. Ipsative assessment tends to correlate with effort, to promote effort-based attributions of success, and to enhance motivation to learn.
Assessment, literacy: being ‘assessment literate’ means our staff and students have an understanding of the purpose and processes of assessment. They will:
- understand the concepts of assessment, assessment criteria and standards
- have the skills to assess themselves and other students and members of staff
- be familiar with different approaches to assessment
- apply marking criteria to their own work
- be able to choose and apply appropriate approaches and techniques to assessment tasks.
Students’ assessment literacy can be developed through pre-assessment induction activities.
Awards – academic regulations defining the various
academic awards (e.g. HND, Foundation Degree, Honours Degree etc) and details on how they are calculated.